Guidelines for reviewing journal manuscripts?

Asked by: Carol Holliday

Guidelines for reviewing manuscripts

  • General rules and structure. Please note that the manuscript you have been asked to review is a privileged (confidential) communication. …
  • Editorial roles. …
  • Publication recommendation. …
  • Narrative evaluation. …
  • Summary of issues to include in a review. …
  • Joint reviews with a student. …
  • Notes.

How do you review a journal manuscript?

How to review a manuscript

  1. 1: Get to know the review format. …
  2. 2: Familiarize yourself with the journal. …
  3. 3: Know what to look for. …
  4. 4: Accept, reject or revise. …
  5. 5: Map out a plan. …
  6. 6: Know your statistics (and if you don’t, just say so) …
  7. 7: Think big picture. …
  8. 8: Meet your deadline.

What should be included in a manuscript review?

Make sure to include feedback on the strengths, as well as the weaknesses, of the manuscript. Examples and explanations of those should consume most of the review. Provide details of what the authors need to do to improve the paper. Point out both minor and major flaws and offer solutions.

What should I look for when reviewing a journal article?

As you read, be sure to note important items like the thesis, purpose, research questions, hypotheses, methods, evidence, key findings, major conclusions, tone, and publication information.

What is the journal review process?

The peer review process for journal publication is essentially a quality control mechanism. It is a process by which experts evaluate scholarly works, and its objective is to ensure a high quality of published science. However, peer reviewers do not make the decision to accept or reject papers.

What are the duties of the reviewer of a manuscript?

Reviewer responsibilities toward readers

  • Ensuring that the methods and analysis are adequately detailed to allow the reader to judge the scientific merit of the study design and be able to replicate the study.
  • Ensuring that the article cites all relevant work by other scientists.

How much time should I spend reviewing a paper?

The more reviews that you do, the less time that you should need to spend on doing the review. It seems like many professors can knock out a review in an hour or less, but most of the graduate students I’ve seen will tend to spend at least 1-2 hours per review if they’re doing a good job.

See also  What are some ways to get to know your characters?

What are the key parameters one must keep in mind while reviewing a manuscript?

Tips for Specific Sections

  • Abstract and introduction. The introduction sets the stage. …
  • Figures and tables. Make sure the manuscript text supports the data shown in the figures and tables. …
  • Methods. …
  • Results, discussion, conclusions. …
  • Statistical analysis. …
  • Data and supporting information. …
  • Writing quality & clarity. …
  • Plagiarism.

What do peer reviewers look for?

Reviewers look for accuracy, timeliness, and appropriateness of the manuscript that can greatly affect the chances of publishing your research. Apart from these, reviewers check for the scientific merits of the manuscript, its methods, and research misconduct (if any).

How do you write a review paper format?

Your review should follow the following structure:

  1. Abstract. Write this last. …
  2. Introduction. Introduce your topic. …
  3. Body. Can take different forms depending on your topic. …
  4. Discussion/Conclusion. Restate your thesis. …
  5. References. Make sure your references are formatted correctly and all present.

What typically happens to a manuscript during the peer review process for a professional journal?

What typically happens to a manuscript during the peer review process for a professional journal? The journal editor sends the manuscript to three experts for their comments before deciding whether to publish it.

Who screens a journal manuscript?

journal editor

After an article is submitted to a journal, a journal editor screens the manuscript and decides whether or not to send it for full peer review. Only after clearing the initial screening is the article sent to one or more peer reviewers.

What is review time of journals?

The time it takes for a journal to get the review process completed varies across journals and fields. While some take a month or two, others can take up to 6 months or more. As you have correctly observed, Statistics/Mathematics journals usually take a longer time, and may at times, take even up to a year to complete.

How long is manuscript review?

Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 80 days. Should the reviewers’ reports contradict one another or a report is unduly delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. If necessary, revised manuscripts may be returned to the initial reviewers, usually within 1 month.

See also  How do I start a business-presentation?

How long does it take for a publisher to review a manuscript?

Peer review commonly takes three to six months. If revisions and another round of peer review are required, more time will be added, depending on how long you take to revise your manuscript and how long the second round of peer review takes.

How long does manuscript stay with editor?

It is perfectly normal for a submission to remain with the editor for over two weeks. The time taken for the different stages varies from journal to journal, but it is not uncommon for the journal system to show a “with editor” status for over a month after submission.

What does EO mean in journal?

Editorial Office

Answer: Firstly, ‘EO’ stands for Editorial Office. Now, the Under Review status typically means that the manuscript has been sent for peer review. However, manuscript statuses can be different for different journals.

How long is Elsevier under review?

First of all, you have to wait for the minimum time to take final decision (that is generally 10-12 weeks for Elsevier). You don’t worry about change date with same status. Your task has been finished since you submitted and even you cannot assume whether reviewer is rejecting or accepting.

Can you edit manuscript after submission?

Because the manuscript may already be under review, changing an already submitted manuscript is normally not possible. You can, however, edit the metadata (for example, add authors).

How do you follow up on a journal submission?

Here is a template that you can use to inquire about the current status of your paper: Dear Mr./Ms. XXX [Editor’s Name], I have submitted my revised manuscript titled XXXX [manuscript id: xxxx] to your journal via the online submission system on dd/mm/yyyy [date of submission].

What happens after your manuscript is accepted?

Once your manuscript has been accepted, all correspondence will be sent to the email address of your corresponding author. The editorial office will give a final check of your manuscript. Your manuscript will go to our production team to prepare your proof.

See also  Is it necessary to always write a prefix to indicate a Part Number in technical writing?

How do you respond to a reviewer?

Ten simple rules for writing a response to reviewers

  1. Rule 1: Provide an overview, then quote the full set of reviews.
  2. Rule 2: Be polite and respectful of all reviewers.
  3. Rule 3: Accept the blame.
  4. Rule 4: Make the response self-contained.
  5. Rule 5: Respond to every point raised by the reviewer.

How do you respond to a 5 star review?

“We are so grateful for your 5-star review. Thanks for sharing your rating with us and the community.” “Thank you for the 5 star rating.” “Thank you so much for taking the time to leave us a 5 star rating – it’s much appreciated!”

How do you respond to a journal editor?

Read, calm down, reflect, wait a day or two before responding, get author input. Always thank the editor and reviewers • Reviewers are asking questions so that the answers can help improve the manuscript. Authors must also add changes to the manuscript.

Where should you place your comments when peer reviewing a paper?

This will also help you keep your comments organized. Think about structuring your review like an inverted pyramid. Put the most important information at the top, followed by details and examples in the center, and any additional points at the very bottom.

How do you review an article review?

5 tips for reviewing a review article

  1. Understand the journal’s requirements. …
  2. Keep in mind that review articles are for a wide audience. …
  3. Determine the review article’s message. …
  4. Be professional and constructive in your comments. …
  5. Keep your feedback consistent and content-focused.

How can I be a good peer reviewer?

Your review should be clear, constructive and consistent.

  1. Clarity is important because authors will not be able to respond to your concerns if they don’t fully understand what they are.
  2. Reviews are most helpful if they don’t just criticise, but also make constructive suggestions for how concerns may be resolved.