Is it unnecessary to mention that there is a silence in the following cases?

Asked by: Mike Smith

Why is it important to remain silent?

In the United States, the right to remain silent is designed to protect a person who is undergoing police questioning or trial. This right may help a person avoid making self-incriminating statements.

Do we have the right to remain silent in India?

Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution states that no one can be compelled to be a witness against himself, the right to remain silent emanates from this very Article. The provision enables the citizens to enjoy the right against self-incrimination which is a fundamental canon of law.

What is the law of silence?

The right to silence is a legal principle which guarantees any individual the right to refuse to answer questions from law enforcement officers or court officials. It is a legal right recognized, explicitly or by convention, in many of the world’s legal systems.

What was Arizona’s argument in Miranda v Arizona?

Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.

Should you remain silent?

You have the constitutional right to remain silent. In general, you do not have to talk to law enforcement officers (or anyone else), even if you do not feel free to walk away from the officer, you are arrested, or you are in jail. You cannot be pun- ished for refusing to answer a question.

Is it better to remain silent?

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.” Attributed to Abraham Lincoln in Golden Book, Nov.

Can you remain silent in court?

What is the right to remain silent? The accused does not have to prove he or she did not commit the crime (unless he raises an appropriate defence). This means, in theory, that the defendant does not need to say anything. This is the fundamental human right to remain silent.

See also  How to express character thoughts in the third person without using dialogue?

Do you have the right to remain silent during interrogation in India?

[7] Art 20(3) of the Indian Constitution provides for the Right against self -incrimination which includes right to remain silent and extends even to interrogation during the investigation[8] and also both to the accused and suspect accused equally.

What right is the right to remain silent?

the Fifth (5th) Amendment

The amendment that gives you the right to remain silent and not incriminate yourself during all stages of a criminal investigation or prosecution is the Fifth (5th) Amendment.

Did Miranda win the case?

At trial, the oral and written confessions were presented to the jury. Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment on each count. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession.

Which statement explains the significance of the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?

Answer: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prevents prosecutors from using a person’s statements made in response to interrogation in police.

How did the case Miranda v. Arizona change the interpretation of the Fifth Amendment?

In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial. The Court referenced Mapp v.

How has the Supreme Court interpreted the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination to apply to all persons questioned in connection with a crime?

The Supreme Court has interpreted the 5th amendment’s protection against self-incrimination because no one should be accused of something they may or may not have committed.

See also  Why do authors invent fictional countries on earth in their novels and how do you keep the lie up?

Which lawyers argued the case for each side Miranda vs Arizona?


  • John J. Flynn for the petitioner, 759.
  • Victor M. Earle, III for the petitioner, 760.
  • F. Conger Fawcett for the petitioner, 761.
  • Gordon Ringer for the petitioner, 584.
  • Gary K. Nelson for the respondent, 759.
  • William I. …
  • Thurgood Marshall Solicitor General, for the United States, 761.
  • William A.

What aspect of the Fifth Amendment does the Miranda decision address?

The term “Miranda Rights” comes from a historic 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case called Miranda v. Arizona. The court held that if the police want to question (interrogate) a person in police custody, they must tell them of the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incriminating statements and their right to an attorney.

What is Miranda Rights in the Philippines?

You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have a right to an attorney.

Why are Miranda Rights important quizlet?

Why are the Miranda rights important in protecting the rights of the arrested? The Miranda rights notify citizens that they have protection from self-incrimination. The Miranda rights remind citizens that they can use a lawyer in their defense.

Why are Miranda Rights called Miranda Rights?

Miranda Rights are named after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda was arrested for stealing $8.00 from an Arizona bank worker. After two hours of questioning, Miranda confessed not only to the robbery but also to kidnapping and rape.

What happens if you don’t understand your Miranda rights?

Many people believe that if they are arrested and not “read their rights,” they can escape punishment. Not true. But if the police fail to read a suspect his or her Miranda rights, the prosecutor can’t use for most purposes anything the suspect says as evidence against the suspect at trial.

See also  Can we use a title that alludes the opposite of what we're arguing for?

Does India have Miranda rights?

No Miranda Warning is not necessary in India as confessions made to police are not admissible as evidence in any circumstances whatsoever. The same is not true for USA as statements made voluntarily to police are admissible as evidence.

What is Miranda Warning and explain?

The Miranda Warning is a police warning which is given to criminal suspects who are in the custody of law enforcement in the United States before they can ask questions regarding what took place during the crime.

What are the Miranda warnings explain when must they be provided to suspects?

The Miranda Warning is all about questioning and being protected from self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment, not being arrested. The person arrested must still answer questions asked about their name, age, address, etc. They can be searched in order to protect the police officer.

What is the exception to the Miranda warnings?

A police officer is not obligated to give the Miranda warnings in these situations: When questioning is necessary for public safety. When asking standard booking questions. When the police have a jailhouse informant talking to the person.

What is the difference between Miranda Rights and Miranda warning?

Answer: We hear these used interchangeably, but Miranda rights are the rights that you, as an individual citizen of the United States, have. The Miranda warning would be when the officer or law enforcement personnel inform you of what those rights are.